this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

Boston, MA

1072 readers
93 users here now

Welcome to c/boston,

A community for all things related to Boston, Massachusetts. Whether you're a local, a visitor, or just interested in the city, this is the place to discuss, share, and connect with fellow Bostonians.

Greater Boston area discussion is welcome here.

Rules:

Be respectful: Treat others with respect and courtesy. Personal attacks, trolling, and harassment will not be tolerated.

Stay on topic: Keep discussions relevant to Boston and its surrounding areas.

Official City of Boston Website

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

While I love that they're investing in rail travel, it would be so much better to make a separate national high speed rail service that competes with amtrak. Thier investors can inject their own billions.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago

Rail is something that works well when organized at government level, not by private entity.

Whether the privatization of the rail exploitation is beneficial or not is subject to debate but privatization of the rail construction and maintenance as been a disaster for the UK and I don't know any other country who attempted to do that.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Building an entirely new rail high speed rail network would cost hundreds of billions of dollars, if not trillions, with a construction time measured in decades and a repayment time of a century, if ever, because passenger rail is very low margin.

In our modern economy where quarterly results are the only thing that matter there is no company that will make that investment.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who the fuck cares about "repayment?" Government services are supposed to provide societal good and compensate for market failures, not turn a profit.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it should be fully publicly owned, but OP said investors should get together to compete with Amtrak, and those investors ostensibly want repaid.

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I meant amtrak can invest in itself. Taxpayer money shouldn't be used to enrich corporations. Unless we're buying shares and getting some control, perhaps.

[–] Sandbag@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You do know Amtrak is not a private company, right?

[–] edryd@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

Yes, when you're a communist government and don't have to pay people for rights-of-way and don't need to worry about profit and don't need to worry about where the money is coming from you can do things very quickly.

We do not have those advantages.