this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
70 points (96.1% liked)

Australia

3600 readers
69 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the short term, it would be time to either relocate to somewhere more practical, or change your lifestyle.

Before cars there were much more extensive public transport and freight systems, especially in regions that weren’t serviced by extant rail corridors.

Just in Western Gippsland;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strzelecki_railway_line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonthaggi_railway_line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noojee_railway_line

Unfortunately, since these Alignments were abandoned by disuse, much of the land has been reclaimed by farmers and developers using colonial-era squatters rights laws. There would need to be extensive Eminent Domain claims raised to reestablish the type of coverage we had before Private vehicles became ubiquitous.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the short term, it would be time to either relocate to somewhere more practical, or change your lifestyle.

Because that's something easily doable in today's economy.

I've got no problem with cars being mostly removed from our cities and it's slowly happening, but the utility of a car cannot be overlooked for non-repetitive and unplanned travel for those of us who don't like the city

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think innocent lives is a fair price to pay for your convenience?

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a disingenuous question and you know it

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Driving a car creates a higher risk of killing people than anything else most people do in their lives. Just look at the road toll. Don't kid yourself, we're definitely talking about a trade-off between convenience and risk to people's lives.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yes and the path of least resistance to minimise that trade off is to make roads and cars safer with separated footpaths and bike ways. Car-restricted and Bike-restricted roads should be introduced. Banning cars and trucks outright creates new problems