this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
142 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
463 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ownership of identifiers, that includes usernames, is regulated by Trademark laws.

If you keep using a moniker, like a username, to conduct trade under it, and/or have it registered as a trademark (which requires you to use it in trade or lose it), then you can legally claim it.

Otherwise, Twitter or any other platform, can do whatever they want with it.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an interesting avenue I hadn't considered. However, the lack of a registered trademark does not mean the lack of any rights whatsoever.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Correct. What decides the rights, is the use. A registered but unused mark loses the rights, while a used but unregistered one keeps the rights (just becomes harder to prove).

And it needs to be used for trade. Like, someone's personal nick, not used for trade, would have no rights. But the nick of someone using it to be an influencer, or a furry artist, would give them some rights.