this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
434 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
5507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Disney is about to own all of Hulu | Disney’s paying more than $8 billion for Comcast’s stake in Hulu.::Disney and Comcast have reached a deal on Hulu’s buyout. Disney expects to pay about $8.61 billion to get the 33 percent owned by Comcast as a result of their agreement in 2019.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither?

I would rather have 20 services, all with access to most of the same content.

Some services give you the option to pick and choose which media packages you want.

These services are now able to compete on a mostly even ground in terms of content, and instead there is an incentive for them to provide a good user experience.

This would also encourage the media companies to stop licencing their content exclusively or as upfront large blocks, and instead per/stream style licensing could show up (where a content owner is paid based off how much their content is watched).

This would then encourage media companies to produce content people want to watch, rather than the last 10 years where the priority is to have larger libraries of exclusive content (even if that content isn't good).

None of that is a given if content companies didn't also own the streaming companies, but it's is the sort of market that had the best version of Netflix (before they were making content their user experience was much better).

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you want tech companies to spend money on features completely outside of the content and then also have the content, and expect that not to cost substantially more?

Producing “content people want to watch” gets you lowest common denominator crap. Say goodbye to prestige TV and hello to reality TV.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're sooooo close.

I want tech companies to create streaming services.

I want content companies to make content.

AKA removing the monopoly.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And somehow you think it’ll be cheaper. It hasn’t made music streaming cheaper. It hasn’t made streaming cable replacements cheaper.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It has made music streaming cheaper.

If you don't like Spotify or feel it's too expensive, do a google search, there are like a dozen alternatives, most of them cheaper.

For Spotify you're paying for one of the better user experiences.

Like I said, you're sooooo close to understanding