this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
1925 points (99.8% liked)

196

16597 readers
1795 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That needs an addendum, otherwise it sounds like any GSW is about as lethal as covid19:

Not accounting for suicides and precision shooting, a single GSW is likely an accident, which drives the lethality down considerably. Filter out unintentional single GSWs and I bet the lethality is rather different.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This article indicates there's no difference, in fact, and is lower than the conservative percentage I was getting earlier.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm reading the abstract wrong, but it appears that the article specifically compares single headshots with multiple GSW including a single head GSW. In which case there's no significant difference.

But maybe I'm reading it wrong. I may be biased, because I really want to believe that JimBob shooting himself in the foot cleaning his gun, occurs with a higher frequency and with less mortality, than people shooting to kill.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I admit I didn't look deep into that particular article. There are a lot of sources easy to find that show that multiple GSWs are surprisingly not that much more lethal, but they're harder to repair. This one for example which lists 13% for single, and 18% for multiple.