this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1642 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1642
Chrome not proceeding with Web Integrity API deemed by many to be DRM (9to5google.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
253 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Chrome team says they're not going to pursue Web Integrity but...

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team "heard your feedback." I'm sure that's true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That usually means they will have something worse at a later time.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

The most likely option is that they will rebrand and we will have to push back against a "completely new, completely different functionality" in a few months.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have to figure out how to apply DRM to YouTube first.

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, Widevine is present in all browsers and actively used by Netflix for example. YouTube also uses this when you're watching movies on YouTube Movies.

Not running DRM on the majority of YouTube content is also likely due to the added cost of running such encryption (the encryption is usually on a per-customer level, not one key fits all) and the added bandwidth and computer cycles required. Not to mention that this might be a legal struggle with the content creators.

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it makes me worried about what they have planned to replace it.