this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
102 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4109 readers
511 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shrewsbury needs it's bypasses improved but there must be a way to swing around the tree.

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the picture there sure is a lot of area around the tree... But hey, if they have a hard on to cut down old significant trees, who's to stop them.

[–] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Significant because of its age? Sure. Significant because of its tenuous ties to Darwin? Someone named it Darwin's Oak a couple years ago to gather public sympathy against the project. You could argue against any development in the area because "Darwin may have walked on these grounds and threw rocks in this stream as a child".

[–] scrchngwsl 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm all for keeping old trees like this one but that's because old trees are good in and of themselves. I care less about Darwin possibly having climbed it 200 years ago and more about little boys and girls climbing it 200 years from now. Nobody will be driving on that bypass in 200 years but I do hope that children will still be climbing trees like this one.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes. Darwin's stream. We should protect that stream.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can tell you there's fuck all chance Darwin was near it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Shrewsbury needs it’s bypasses improved

Does it, though? I see a perfectly good railroad, as well as National Cycle Route 81, running right through town. So WTF does anybody need a bypass for?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

To turn public funds into private profits.