this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15583 readers
81 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been trying to print a print-in-place planetary gear without any luck. Today I found out about a setting that finally got it to print. Cura's slicing tolerance -> exclusive uses the largest part of each layer to calculate the slice which can help when trying to print something with tighter tolerances. Unfortunately, the setting doesn't appear to be in any other slicers, but maybe someone else knows another way to achieve this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is your part as printed sloped?

In any case, if you’re designing parts yourself, I highly recommend printing a quick test print- pegs in holes (maybe also square pegs in square holes- and maybe pair those so on square is at 45 degrees to x and y axis.)

There’s a few reasons for this. One is that holes like to be smaller than called for. Another is mechanical limits, and also… because of slicing weirdness (as thst setting above seeks to fix.)

Armed with the knowledge of how tight your printer can get with any given material, yiu can then design parametric tolerances into them.

My guess is your part was just a bit too tight and going to exclusive cleaned it up a bit- if the part had a 45 deg. Slope, and you were printing at .4mm extrusion width, you would have shrunk your part by .2

As far as I can tell, the reason that Prusa slicer doesn’t have it is that it handles the issue different with, in part, Arachne controlling extrusion width on the fly