this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
369 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3084 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google executives acknowledged this month they need to do a better job surfacing user-generated content after the recent Reddit blackouts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sazey@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for bringing up Kagi, I had never heard of it before. An intriguing idea for sure and I am not averse to paying for searches, but as a serial Google-fu practitioner $10/month for 1000 searches (1.5c per search after) seems quite steep to me. Some days I swear that would last me 24 hours at most. I need to start tracking that I think.

I do however applaud the seeming transparency on their website. It may or may not be for me, but if they really plan to operate how they lay out on their website, it truly is a breath of fresh air and I wish them luck.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for bringing up Kagi

Comparing the pricing on a "search value" basis is compelling, but I'll be damned if I can't find concrete details on what they actually do differently. Just looks like a lot of marketing-speak.

E.g., do they have humans reviewing the results? Or is it just LLM crap? Because if it's more AI bullshit, they can fuck right off to where the Titanic and Titan lay.