this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
1026 points (97.0% liked)

Work Reform

10045 readers
1049 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Traditionally, retiring entails leaving the workforce permanently. However, experts found that the very definition of retirement is also changing between generations.

About 41% of Gen Z and 44% of millennials — those who are currently between 27 and 42 years old — are significantly more likely to want to do some form of paid work during retirement.

...

This increasing preference for a lifelong income, could perhaps make the act of “retiring” obsolete.

Although younger workers don’t intend to stop working, there is still an effort to beef up their retirement savings.

It's ok! Don't ever retire! Just work until you die, preferably not at work, where we'd have to deal with the removal of your corpse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 105 points 1 year ago (3 children)

are currently between 27 and 42 years old — are significantly more likely to want to do some form of paid work during retirement.

Want is not the right word there, and it completely changes the message. This is a fucking hit job, trying to convince people that company executives stealing pension plans, and a failed society that abandons its elderly, is something young people desire.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a person over 40 years old, let me be clear: I never want to work.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would have retired 20 years ago if I could. I will never understand people that say they don't know what they'd do with themselves in retirement. What unimaginative and boring people they must be. I have a thousand interests I can't fully pursue because of work obligations.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Let me be clear: I want to retire, and I want to do so under ten years from now.

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was my stepdad, always said that. I just would tell him “whatever you want.” And it wasn’t for a lack of hobbies, he has plenty. I just don’t understand the mindset of people that want to “work.” Like, I love making things and “working” on my own things, but never have I gone to work and happy to be there. To work for a manager that micromanages me, another manager who want me to falsify records, (that btw it won’t come back to him but to me,) a GM who would put undo pressure on you to stay longer then you were scheduled. Fuck that place. Nothing made me happier when my situation changed and didn’t need to pick up extra hours. Six hour mark rolled around and I was out. I’d take that time go to the gym, go on a bike ride, go rock climbing, go paddle boarding because I sure as hell enjoyed working on myself more then I ever did at any job. And to work so hard for so little, damn if America isn’t just on large pyramid scheme.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m one of those people. If not pointed in a specific direction by someone else I’ll just aimlessly do nothing but kill time for months on end. I have a couple interests, but nothing that could keep me occupied for an extra 40 hours a week.

This isn’t to say I love working, but I don’t hate it either. I’d rather have work than no work, even for the same amount of money.

[–] Dkiscoo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Just do shit until you say "hey that was nifty" or run out of money. Whatever comes first.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

As someone between 27 and 42, I love getting shit accomplished but I have never in my life wanted to work

[–] Flambo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Want is not the right word there, and it completely changes the message.

Or perhaps it's the right word, because it completely changes the message in precisely the way they intend.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It's certainly the intended word. But it's not "right" by any reasonable metric of correctness.

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In older vocabulary, "want" was actually the stronger form of "need".

Perhaps we're returning to tradition in more ways than one?