this post was submitted on 02 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZedong

4298 readers
119 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

His predictions are pretty logically based for someone who fetishizes the Confederacy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As for the article itself: my main gripe with it is that he thinks liberals are leftists. But i also think he underestimates the ideological unity that exists in the US government and overestimates the hostility of red states toward a blue federal government and vice versa. In reality the two parties are far more aligned than the partisan theater they put on would have Americans believe. If push comes to shove even the most anti-Biden MAGA politician in the reddest of red states, you know those people who call Democrats "demonrats" and like to act all tough and talk about secession and civil war, will still fall in line behind a Democrat led federal government. There's a lot of empty rhetoric being thrown around as red meat for the base, but in reality they all have a vested interest in preserving the integrity and institutional legitimacy of the state, and that will take precedence over any of the culture war partisan bickering. The US does not have a two party system, it has one party with two faces. Until a real opposing political force coalesces whose material interests stand in contradiction to those of the existing political institutions and establishment that will not change.

Also, i find it funny that the author tries to claim that blue states will have to be subsidized by the red states in the future when as things stand today the exact opposite is happening. Also lots of very unoriginal and boring conservative talking points in this article, a lot of the usual "go woke, go broke" right wing clichees. All in all i'm not impressed and i have seen much better and more realistic predictions for how a civil war in the US could occur and what it would look like.

[–] CommieGabredabok@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the article stated:

For instance, during the Covid ‘crisis’ the federal government infamously began confiscating monoclonal antibodies and other anti-covid ‘therapies’ from red states simply because they were too successful, and red states could not be allowed to cure their populations of the scam disease as that would expose the lie. To allow the disparity between red and blue to become obvious on the national stage would be dangerous for the ruling class.

So yeah, it seems like in many areas the author is talking out of his asshole

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How would that even work, if the disease was scam then taking the "cure" would not change anything. Hell why they even needed or had the cure for a scam disease.