this post was submitted on 02 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
4298 readers
119 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As for the article itself: my main gripe with it is that he thinks liberals are leftists. But i also think he underestimates the ideological unity that exists in the US government and overestimates the hostility of red states toward a blue federal government and vice versa. In reality the two parties are far more aligned than the partisan theater they put on would have Americans believe. If push comes to shove even the most anti-Biden MAGA politician in the reddest of red states, you know those people who call Democrats "demonrats" and like to act all tough and talk about secession and civil war, will still fall in line behind a Democrat led federal government. There's a lot of empty rhetoric being thrown around as red meat for the base, but in reality they all have a vested interest in preserving the integrity and institutional legitimacy of the state, and that will take precedence over any of the culture war partisan bickering. The US does not have a two party system, it has one party with two faces. Until a real opposing political force coalesces whose material interests stand in contradiction to those of the existing political institutions and establishment that will not change.
Also, i find it funny that the author tries to claim that blue states will have to be subsidized by the red states in the future when as things stand today the exact opposite is happening. Also lots of very unoriginal and boring conservative talking points in this article, a lot of the usual "go woke, go broke" right wing clichees. All in all i'm not impressed and i have seen much better and more realistic predictions for how a civil war in the US could occur and what it would look like.
Yeah, the article stated:
So yeah, it seems like in many areas the author is talking out of his asshole
How would that even work, if the disease was scam then taking the "cure" would not change anything. Hell why they even needed or had the cure for a scam disease.