this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
398 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59602 readers
3710 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
398
Microsoft fixes the Excel feature that was wrecking scientific data (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because every scientist is also a programmer?
Especially if they struggle to use Excel properly, no chance.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’d be embarrassed to call myself a scientist if I didn’t know how to at least script basic shit and effortlessly reproduce data analyses. The bar for entry into every single stage of academic science is too fucking low. 95% of this literature is irreproducible shit, in part because fuckwits don’t know how to code. Scientists don’t need to be software engineers, but yes, they need to be able to program. It wasn’t this way 20 years ago, but it most certainly is nowadays.