this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

515 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All the downloaders that I find only downloads to the server and I only want a UI without ads to make easies to use yt-dlp without the terminal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geo38@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This MeTube in a local docker container seems to do what OP wants:

https://github.com/alexta69/metube

tag /u/kutu-dev

[–] lilolalu@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have MeTube running, it does not what OP wants (unless he reconsidered) because it downloads the files to server storage.

[–] Skaronator@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you can just start the container on his PC, then the Server is his PC?

[–] lilolalu@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but then you can just start yt-dlp itself, with a GUI, no need to install a docker environment...

Cross platform https://github.com/dsymbol/yt-dlp-gui

Windows https://github.com/kannagi0303/yt-dlp-gui

Mac https://github.com/section83/MacYTDL

[–] geo38@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure

So, you're saying the link I posted actually does do what the OP wants?

[–] lilolalu@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Well, he could also install a VM, install Linux and then install MeTube and then download the files to his PC. So, yes, installing MeTube in a docker on his Desktop PC, does what OP wants with a completely unnecessary overhead of complexity because there are yt-dlp clients for virtually every os. It's a single binary on windows so there is absolutely zero reasons to install it in a docker container :)