this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
1034 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12272 readers
1912 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... as the other guy says below, if you're considering revolution surely a general strike is a notch below that level of commitment.

But also, I've lived through multiple general strikes. I don't know what to tell you, a party and a bunch of unions called for them, people followed them at will. Some changed stuff, others didn't. Nobody lost their jobs or homes, among other things because it's illegal to retalliate against a strike. Because, you know, we had strikes about that.

We're not even a particularly old democracy, we were an outright fascist country less than a century ago. My dad remembers running away from fascist police when he was in college. I don't know what to tell you.

[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Part of the problem for major reforms is that large areas of empty land have more power than the will of the people to get things through the Senate.

[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a party and a bunch of unions called for them

In the US there are only two parties of any real significance. General strike is something neither of them would ever call for. Only about 10.1% of US workers have a union.

Nobody lost their jobs or homes, among other things because it's illegal to retalliate against a strike.

In the US, strike retaliation, while technically illegal, is very rarely enforced. When it is, the penalty is ... they have to undo the thing they did and were penalized for. No fine, no concession, no additional monitoring, and there was always the (very good) chance they'd get away with it.

Sadly, in a country where guns are common and unions aren't, armed revolt is just more imaginable than a general strike.

[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

well said, thank you.