this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
212 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
4350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
212
Space is starting to look like the better mining operation (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I'm reading the delta-V map on Wikipedia correctly escaping the solar system is cheaper by about 97.7% than shooting something directly into the sun (18009 m/s vs 790371 m/s from launch). Reducing orbital energy is paradoxically really expensive...

Even just getting something to orbit the sun closer than mercury is more expensive than shooting it out of the solar system entirely.

So yeah looking at those numbers I think space mining is a lot more practicable than I though, delta-v from the moon to the kuiper belt (including capture burns in the kuiper belt around asteroids/planetoids) is cheaper than from the earth to the moon, only problem is travel time.