this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
473 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59602 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix confirms it is increasing subscription prices, again, after adding 8.8 million customers::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you have more than two streaming services it now cost more than cable.

We've come full circle, guys!

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not sure which streaming services you mean but cable back when I had it YEARS ago was over $120 a month. That was just the tv part, not including internet.

I can’t think of 3 streaming services that come near that price.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're getting there. At one time TV was $40/month

[–] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And now my basic Internet connection from the only provider in the area (who is also the TV provider) is $100/mo

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yea you could really pay a lot depending on how many channels you subscribed to and especially if you had premium channels like HBO or Starz.

I'm sure we'll get there though.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

At least for now we don't have to watch ads....

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Only if you’re counting YouTubeTV as one of those and even still, I remember my dad arguing with dish or direct about the $150 bill all the time over a decade ago. We switched cable providers every other year to keep the price in the low $100 range and as soon as the honeymoon period was over they would double it.

Even YouTubeTV+Netflix+Disney+w/e is less than cable for now

[–] online@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cost of cable where I can choose what I want to watch when I want to watch it. Whereas before I had to hope that the programming directors for the different channels picked something somewhere worth watching when I turned on the tube.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now, you only have to hope whatever show you want to watch is on any of the services you are subscribed to, and won't be pulled before you finish it.

[–] online@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes that's true too. It's still better than cable. I had access to even less content back then compared to now.

I use this to find what I want to watch when I have something specific that I'm looking for: https://www.justwatch.com/

I also think people should be pirates.

But streaming, at the same cost as cable, is much better than the decades of cable I remember before streaming actually became a real competitor.

[–] Tom_bishop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Die a hero, or live long enough to become the villain