this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
144 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
431 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NDAs contribute to insider trading, not mitigate it.

It means the people who know they are doing shitty things can’t warn everyone else

No, they don't. If you can't track where information is, the ability of people to act on a tip massively increases, and the enforcement is much more difficult.

They are effectively legally required to use NDAs when discussing future directions of their business. There may not be an explicit regulation you can point to, but when information is spread around without tight control and someone acts on it, the SEC can and very willingly does get involved. There's a reason it's effectively universal for any publicly traded company with meaningful legal representation, and it's because it's a ridiculous level of negligence to have those conversations without them.