Technology

59237 readers

3609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

162

Their kids died after buying drugs on Snapchat. Now the parents are suing (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Their kids died after buying drugs on Snapchat. Now the parents are suing::Suit claims app features like disappearing messages and geolocating users make kids easy targets for dealers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MYCOOLNEJM@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lmao, what? They might as well sue phone manufacturers for giving kids access to internet and app stores where they can install apps that enables drug dealers to reach kids or whatever

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Except for

Even after she created her own account and found her son’s dealer posting images with hundreds of pills, Mendoza’s reports to the help center went unanswered, and it took eight months for them to flag his account. “It was really disheartening,” she said.

And

Other problematic features include notifying individuals when another person screenshots their post, the ability to geolocate fellow users and algorithms that suggest new connections based on demographics.

[–] MYCOOLNEJM@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

"I will ask snapchat to stop doing bad things, but I will not delete their app from my kids smartphone. It's their responsibility, not mine"

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, so the parent knew about this issue for over eight months and did nothing to actually get their kid help?

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who said they didn't?

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that they still allowed their kid to have access to the drug dealing app/device that has the drug dealing app on it.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Or they removed it and then the kid put it back. Yes, they might have been able to take the device away entirely but that's not really effective, and the strong parental controls are only available for kids up to 13 (at least on Android).

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That doesn't absolve Google or Apple for facilitating the download of the app where drug dealers frolic.

[–] howlingecko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perhaps SnapChat files a counter suit on the parents for buying their kid a smartphone, paying for service, and not putting parental controls on the device to keep them from using apps that they don’t want their kid accessing

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Google parental controls shut down automatically after a certain age.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not much of a counter suit. It's legal to buy your kid a smartphone and it's legal to not put parental controls on it.