this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
316 points (95.9% liked)

United Kingdom

4113 readers
262 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
tom
GreatAlbatross
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
316
Outrage after Greta Thunberg arrested at London oil summit protest (leftfootforward.org)
submitted 1 year ago by Syldon to c/unitedkingdom
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Jo Maugham, Director of the Good Law Project, posted on X: “What a brave, democratic, free speech loving, nation we have become under the so-called Conservative Party.”

The most pertinent part for me. The Tories have legalised suppression.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syldon 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should not be arrested for protesting. This is a direct contravention of article 11 of the human rights act.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thunberg and other protestors blocked entrances at the hotel, trying to prevent delegates from entering.

I think it's that blocking that might've caused the arrest, not protesting itself. As the link says

Are there any restrictions to this right?

There are some situations where a public authority can restrict your rights to freedom of assembly and association.

This is only the case where the authority can show that its action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:

protect national security or public safety

prevent disorder or crime

protect health or morals, or

protect the rights and freedoms of other people.

Probably falls under the last point

[–] Syldon 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is loose and contentious. I have no doubt that Thunberg will use funds to take the UK court to the ECHR. She should have taken advice beforehand. I would be very surprised if she didn't.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If she was arrested for preventing entry its probably "okay". Otherwise morons would be blocking access to abortion clinics and they would not be able to be arrested/dispersed. Its complicated even from moral point of view for me. I like to protest and complain but i also would like places being accessible with the current "trend" of evangelical extremisim spilling over to here... Wuats next blocking access to libraries becsuse they have a book that talks about abortion?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty much everywhere that would be called civil disobedience, yes it's illegal but it shouldn't be so you take the arrest and essentially argue it's morality.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's the way to test it out