this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
34 points (92.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
244 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like the guardian wanted to get rid of him for a while. Apparently he has been involved in antisemitism incidents in the past. They don't need the controversy he brings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My understanding is that the cartoon is based on a cartoon of Lyndon B Johnson from decades ago. However, the cartoon uses the common metaphor of taking a "pound of flesh" from something to make it's point.

That metaphor is attributed the character Shylock from Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice. Shylock is considered by many to be an offensive stereotype of a Jewish person (I think it is) that is sort of "tolerated" when used in a historical context, but not otherwise. i.e. if you call a Jewish person "Shylock", expect rightly to be called a racist.

The cartoon applied to LBJ isn't offensive because, afaik, he isn't Jewish. But take the character and Netanyahu, smush them together and bam: antisemitism claims.

[–] Emperor 2 points 1 year ago

The cartoon applied to LBJ isn’t offensive because, afaik, he isn’t Jewish. But take the character and Netanyahu, smush them together and bam: antisemitism claims.

Also Johnson isn't operating on himself - he's just lifting his shirt to show the scar.