this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
252 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
4851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aubertlone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They linked the kilogram to the gravitational force.

It's part of an effort to clarify how we define things. We're now trying to link our recorded units to the basic forces they are related to. So now, the kilogram is defined by the gravitational force, the meter by how fast light travels, etc etc

[–] PflaumeKordel@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

The kilogram is defined as the mass equivalent of a photon of a specific energy via the Planck constant h thus linking the speed of light and the frequency of the hyperfine level of caesium-133. The relative uncertainty of the measured value of the gravitational constant G is 10^-5 which would lead to a definition of the kilogram that has a worse relative uncertainty than using the former definition defined via an international prototype. The Wikipedka article is more detailed than this short summary.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] aubertlone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

TiL

I knew about redifining the kilogram as it's related to gravity beforehand

But not the next part about kg and photons and planck etc etc. I learned all that just now by reading a response to my comment

I genuinely did not know about the relationship to light until just now.

So, yes. But again, your comment alone didn't help me understand about the relationship beforehand. I wasn't sure what you meant at all, so just responded with my understanding of it