this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
592 points (97.4% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29098 readers
320 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So far Lemmy is vibing. Everyone here is excited and optimistic and willing to put up with a few rough spots to be part of something.

When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sedawk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm wondering the same, I would guess grey listing and shadow banning to be the most effective.

[โ€“] maporita@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Shadow banning is Orwellian . something you might expect from the CCP instead of a supposedly progressive online forum. If you're going to ban someone at least have the decency to let them know they are banned.

[โ€“] Anemia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's certainly a harsher punishment than normal banning, but I don't see why it would be that different. Assuming you have a user posting something bannable and always sign it with their initials. But whenever they are banned they come back under a different name and continue to do bannable offenses. That is a good reason for shadowbanning imo.

Though any first offense should always be normal-banned imo.

[โ€“] sedawk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right, it is, but there are some folks who want nothing more than to burn down what you built. In the real world those people get physically dealt with, but in the virtual world where there's no means of physically restraining someone, what's your alternative?

[โ€“] PorkrollPosadist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

All these American tech firms shadow ban people. The practice is very abusive, but it is also very American.

[โ€“] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shadow banning is a bit controversial.

[โ€“] Lemming@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah I would rather we just ban them outright