this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1229 points (94.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20770 readers
2435 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You also need the flag "--no-preserve-root".

[–] Silejonu@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

No you don't.

rm -fr / requires the flag, but rm -fr /* does not.

[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that is only if you pass /, I don't think the flag is required for /* which is what is shown here - if I remember right, it's because the * triggers the shell to expand the paths and that flag is only built to protect / (from say, having an empty variable alongside /).

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, the * is expanded by the shell so the rm command just sees lots of individual files being passed in