this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1207 points (90.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5428 readers
3104 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The "well regulated" portion seems to enjoy being ignored still.

[–] crunchyoutside@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) - the US Supreme Court decided that the Founding Fathers put that "well-regulated militia" bit in as a joke nvm.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"well-regulated" does not mean what you think it means.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course... it means whatever someone needs it to mean.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course it is. 14th amendment has been twisted to meet one's needs as well.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you want to live in alternate facts land, Fox News is over there - - - - - - - - - - - >

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's my point exactly. Conservatives have manipulated the constitution to match their needs. Have they not?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Everyone attempts that. We need to stop letting them get away with it, not do away with the concept of the Constitution.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not sure where I said the constitution should be ignored. Quite the opposite. It should be followed but hasn't been followed since the beginning with the forefathers. I said it's a "good goal". I guess we are both arguing the same point on the same side.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Probably. I was addressing the general conversations in this thread more than you specifically.