this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
577 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59673 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mini B was rated for something like 10x fewer insertion cycles than micro B, the retaining tabs would give out and the connector would fall off... or worse, twist and break the socket's inner plastic bit.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some reason I always had fewer problems (meaning none) with mini B breaking than with micro B or C breaking.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In my experience, Mini B was mostly used for data transfer, along with some other port to do the charging. Micro B got introduced as the "all in one" data+charging port. I've seen both kinds of ports break, but only the Mini B ones that were also used for charging; the data-only ones, were fine.

My conclusion is that charging ports use more insertion cycles and are more likely to break, and I keep magnetic charging adapters in all of them (as a side effect, twisting the cable or pulling at an angle just disconnects it, instead of breaking the port).