this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
1083 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19551 readers
992 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's no ISO standardized definition for variable. People use that word with all kinds of meaning.

[–] drcouzelis@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waaaait a minute... isn't it called a variable because the contents are, you know, variable?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It started as a variable, then ended as a constant.

[–] Yen 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is needlessly obtuse. The definition of the word is that it's non-constant. There isn't an ISO definition of the word no, but there are many reputable dictionaries out there that will serve as an alternative.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, starting with the definition from algebra, where it's not something allowed to vary...

I guess more people know about math than use imperative programing languages.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except that's exactly what it is allowed to in algebra.

Sure, in most equations you solve in early algebra school there is only one possible value for the variables. But in many equations there can be multiple, or even infinite. It's an unknown, and the contents can vary (depending on other constraints, ie. The rest of the equation(s)).

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's no time in algebra for your variables to vary.

When you have a non-unitary set of solutions, you have a constant non-unitary set of solutions.