this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
686 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59602 readers
3280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube isn't happy you're using ad blockers — and it's doing something about it::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm pretty happy paying for YouTube Premium; it seems like a fair deal given how much my family uses YouTube. But I'm worried that sooner or later YouTube Premium is gonna get Google Graveyarded, or they're going to insert ads anyway.

[–] CosmoNova@feddit.de 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube premium is a very short sighted band-aid solution. Because the more people sign up for it early, the more expensive and/or less convenient it will become later when the 'market is saturated' (meaning there's no one left who wants to sign up for it). When they can't grow their income through more users, they'll ramp up prices and shave off services. It's happening everywhere already and in the end you'll wish everyone advocated for adblockers a little more because by the time you're fed up with their pricing, it might already be too late to go back.

[–] myusernameblows@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the real insidious thing about internet enshittification. It's run by publicly traded corporations so it's not enough just to squeeze every possible dollar out of your customers, you have to keep ramping up the squeeze. Even once you're bringing in billions and billions of pure profit with a product that everyone loves, you have an actual legal duty to your shareholders to make it worse in an effort to try to grow the profit even more

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Premium has already been enshittified. You used to get Youtube Music alongside it, now you have to buy it separate. The worst part is that a lot of people only bought premium for one or the other, so even among those who bothered to switch over, they cut their userbase in half.

[–] dan@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Guaranteed they’d find a way to double dip. Price gouging, restricting content behind further paywalls, adding ads anyway… absolutely they’ve investigated all those and undoubtedly more.

Switch to Firefox, Chrome is their biggest lever to force this kind of stuff onto people. While Firefox exists and it remains uncool for them to block it they’ll have to compete against piracy and adblockers which will limit their ability to aggressively monetise.

Switch to firefox!

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just look at where Netflix and Amazon Prime are going.

The days of YouTube premium being ad free are numbered. I suspect 2-3 years before it's announced, rolled back, and then a stealth rollout is done.

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I consider it already not ad free considering how many video creators shove sponsored segments in all their videos.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's largely because youtube native ads aren't a reliable, predictable or consistant source of income. Plus youtube takes the largest cut of the money from those ads.

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean I get it and i don’t blame them for doing it, but it just makes googles claim of youtube premium being “ad free” insulting. Why would I give them money when they can’t even pay their content creators consistently enough, forcing them into alternative revenue systems? I’d rather just block ads on youtube and pay my favorite creators directly.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There are plugins to automatically skip those segments too. They crowd source the begin and end times of the ads and automatically skip ahead.

[–] virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

YT isn't going to drop premium any time soon. Subscriptions are astronomically more revenue generating then ads, and given YT was always operating at a loss until they stopped reporting revenue altogether premium will probably be the only route to scrape by.

Not to say they can't enshittify it by raising prices and adding restrictions, but I can't see them doing anything but trying to force more people to it.

I paid for it for a bit a while back, and it was decent. Of course free tools give considerably better features (adblock, sponsor block, DRM free downloads, better privacy). That and personally not wanting to financially support YT for a variety of reasons has kept me away from it for a long time.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The main reason I never went for premium is that they basically do what the writers strike in Hollywood recently had to deal with: YT keeps pretty much all of the money from subscriptions and creators get almost nothing. Many saw huge drops in revenue after the program went live.

To show just how exploitative their system is: subscribing to a channel (supporting them directly) still has you seeing ads. Even white supremacist "cracker is a slur" Twitch realized the importance of not playing advertisements on the channels you sub to.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FYI, subscribing on YT is equivalent to following on Twitch, free and just for notifications. Twitch subscriptions are more like YT channel members, emotes and all.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used subscribing as shorthand for channel membership because that shit's hard to work into a sentence.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, but subscribing is used two ways here, so it could be confusing to someone who doesn't know both.