GayBros

1117 readers

21 users here now

By GayBros, for GayBros. Almost everything is allowed.

Rules:

Remember the human.
We are all bros here;
Posts with NSFW images are NOT allowed: This is not a porn community.

You can find other communities/instances in https://lemmyverse.net/.

If you want a porn related community, check out /c/gaybrosgonewild@lemmynsfw.com. Their sidebar also has other nsfw communities. If you want to see NSFW content, you have to go to your account settings and enable the option to see NSFW content.

Logo design credit goes to @snowe@programming.dev

Banner design credit goes to @Speckle@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

wit@lemmy.world

Speckle@lemmy.world

Ensign_Rutherford@startrek.website

Elton John and Ian McKellen lead backlash over Braverman’s call to crack down on gay asylum seekers (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by FriendOfElphaba@sh.itjust.works to c/gaybros@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Question for the UK LGBT community: This article makes it sound like the pink vote is significant to the Tories. As an American, I’m having a really hard time imagining how that comes about. I’d accuse it of being slanted, but it quotes a number of Tory MPs who are publicly and strongly criticizing the statement.

In the US, the LGBT vote is pretty overwhelmingly Democratic. There’s a small group that support republicans, but it’s very rare - to the point it’s something worthy of notice and a point of contention.

So, is the portrayal in this article accurate? What are the politics over there? I’ve been active politically since the days of ACT UP, so I know what things are like over here, but I’m completely stunned by what they’re presenting about the political alignment over there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Her claim came after Sir Elton and his long-term partner David Furnish released a statement saying they were “very concerned” by her comments and calling for “more compassion, support and acceptance for those seeking a safer future”.

They were joined by acting legend Sir Ian, who told Channel 4 News Ms Braverman’s remarks were “laced with a good dollop of prejudice” and part of a tilt at a Tory leadership bid.

Ms Braverman was accused of “picking on” gay people and “throwing [them] under the bus” – with senior Tories warning that she had alienated the LGBT+ voters and revived the “nasty party” reputation.

One former Tory cabinet minister, who claimed the Conservatives had won the support of almost all gay voters after making same-sex marriages legal in 2013, told The Independent that Ms Braverman had torpedoed the party’s LGBT+ credentials.

Andrew Boff – a leading Tory London Assembly member who is patron of the LGBT+ Conservatives group – told The Independent that Ms Braverman was indulging in “dog whistle” politics to appeal to the right.

In an unusual move, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) rebuked Ms Braverman’s speech after she claimed global leaders had failed to reform asylum rules because they fear being called “racist”.

The original article contains 1,122 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!