this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
254 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syldon 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It be an additional viewpoint I would like to see also.

I am from the NE. I could easily see many in my area falling foul of the inheritance tax limits. I see London as being an area where many circumvent it by offshoring.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are the limits determined by the whole value of the estate, or the value passed to each descendent? If the former, I can see how even a semi-decent house could pass the £375k threshold. But if the latter, once the estate has been split between multiple children and/or grandchildren, very few recipients are going to be hitting £375k from half a house.

[–] Syldon 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] frog@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I concur that it's on the value of the estate of the person who died.

But there is also this: "The standard Inheritance Tax rate is 40%. It’s only charged on the part of your estate that’s above the threshold."

And given the threshold rises to £500k when it's between direct family (parent to child, etc), and you're only paying on the value above the threshold... you have to inherit a pretty big house from your parents to even have to pay inheritance tax. Say it was a £550k house, so there's tax to pay on the £50k over half a million. 40% of that comes out to £20k, which sure, is a lot of money... but getting a little £20k mortgage on that massive £550k house you just inherited would absolutely be viable. I think the overlap of people with family wealthy enough to have £500k+ houses, but who themselves are so low paid and have such a low credit score that a tiny mortgage is literally impossible, is really, really low. Like there could be a few edge cases, but I'd be willing to bet the majority of people who are in a position to inherit a £550k house are also in a position where a £20k mortgage would not be hard to arrange, especially given they now have a high value asset to secure the mortgage against.

[–] Syldon 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There won't be many banks who would not mortgage a £550 asset for £20k.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. You'd have to be really, really untrustworthy, with an appalling credit score and no income, and probably a criminal record for fraud, before a bank wouldn't do that mortgage. So paying inheritance tax on a high value asset isn't impossible if you don't have the actual cash in the bank at the time of your relative's death.