this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
47 points (89.8% liked)

Mastodon

5239 readers
1 users here now

Decentralised and open source social network.

https://joinmastodon.org/

GitHub

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I created an account on mastodon.social a few days ago. A day after creation, my account was suspended. My appeal was denied and no reason was given. So I assumed mastodon.social was not accepting new accounts, so I moved over to mastodon.online and created an account there. Today that account was suspended as well, again without reason. I didn't post anything from either account. My only actions were to follow a few people within tech.

Looking at previous posts here, people are laughing at complaints about difficulties of joining mastodon and pushing it away as a simple task. I have now attempted to join two of the highest suggested servers of mastodon and gotten suspended from both. I am uninterested in shotgunning servers until I find one which doesn't suspend me without reason.

How is the onboarding process of mastodon supposed to work if the top suggested servers are suspending new accounts without warning or reason?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Captchas and email verifications can be easily bypassed.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Emails, sure. Captchas require a fair bit of elbow grease. Generating a random username which looks fine is nothing in the landscape of bot protection.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bot farmers could find an exploit in reCaptcha. Or they could train up a neutral network to accurately defeat them (I saw someone demonstrating a GPT4 prompt that could handle it quickly and flawlessly with just a little bit of prompt engineering). When (not if) they find a way to defeat captcha, those lower level protections become way more important and relevant.

It's an ever-moving set of problems; fixing it today is no guarantee that it'll still be fixed tomorrow, so everything has to stay in place until it's proven to no longer be effective or to cause more problems than it fixes.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It just seems like the perspective is off. Implementing some script which reads images of the website which depicts the CAPTCHA, sending it to some AI-solution which can succeed some percentage of the time. Adding this to something which can interact with the website (not sure if you'll need to indirectly act through something like selenium or if you can make direct web-calls), while also ensuring that the CAPTCHA doesn't receive other suspicious data.

If you go through that trouble, I would be amazed if combining 2 or 3 words from a dictionary into a username would be the kryptonite of your bot farm.

Again, I don't know, and it might be a much more preventative solution than I can understand, but it feels like a strange security by obscurity.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong, but it's also one of those things where you don't want to make things easier for the bad actor, especially since most people aren't going to be signing up with random strings.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This does not make suspicious random usernames not spam. They generally are spam accounts.

A recent spam I just received five days ago was from @oyPhFrxPx0@mastodon.social.