Asklemmy

43396 readers

1269 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

127

What is your opinion about Lemmy not having karma but Kbin having reputation points? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by gylotip@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally, I prefer Lemmy over Kbin because I hate karma and reputation points. I do not want to worry about downvotes, and Lemmy feels so fresh. I can post things that will receive lots of downvotes and not need to worry about losing karma.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A karma score encourages making poor quality meme posts and comments in large quantities to gain more fake internet points. It's easily abused; Reddit is full of karma farming bots.

No downvotes was also mentioned here, but I heavily disagree. Downvotes, in my opinion are mostly a positive thing. Youtube hiding downvotes was a move towards a "good vibes only, no criticism allowed" type of environment.

Lemmy pretty much meets my ideal in this regard, it has downvotes and doesn't have a broken social credit system.

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are posts that contain despicable information/news but are useful to know, and I always struggled between upvoting or not voting since downvoting would remove karma from OP.

[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 5 points 1 year ago

Downvotes aren't intended for the subject of the news, but for OP for making the post. If you hate the subject, I guess the correct action is to express it in the comments, or give an upvote if someone else already did.

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was an idea from blahaj.zone who considered making down votes enabled, but have less "weight" compared to upvotes. It sounded pretty interesting but I don't think they implemented it yet.

[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Could you link that? I don't see an obvious benefit, but it sounds interesting.

[–] Firefly7@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/104422