this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
113 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

52 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

And got a straightforward no as a response XD

Kbin link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warped@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see Meta going ahead with their plan, and everyone blocking them. They will then start bad-mouthing the Fediverse because it's never their fault.

[–] Bloonface@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... realistically, why would that be their fault if they were to start a fedi instance and everyone else blocked them?

[–] deeoh@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Because of their historical track record?

[–] Dangdoggo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if everyone defederated the message would be clear: Meta is unwelcome here. Their following press releases would probably spin a very different narrative about immature tech and privacy concerns.

[–] Bloonface@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Their following press releases would probably spin a very different narrative about immature tech and privacy concerns.

What else do you expect them to do? Say "oh yeah I guess a bunch of guys on fedi say we are arseholes, so we must be"?