United Kingdom

4104 readers

146 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

Thames Water: Is this the worst company in Britain? (www.cityam.com)

submitted 1 year ago by bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works to c/unitedkingdom

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thames Water found itself at the centre of another industry scandal, with the supplier yesterday ordered by Ofwat to hand back over £100m to customers after failing to meet standards for fixing pipe leakages, sewage overflows and environmental protection.

Industry regulator Ofwat has ordered the UK’s largest supplier – which serves 15m customers- to cut bills after its latest annual performance review had found the supplier had fallen short of standards.

The report is the latest blow for the troubled supplier, which has been struggling under a £14bn debt pile,

My suspicion is that utility companies are not generally going to spend more on infrastructure if they have their price limits get cut, especially ones that can't handle their existing debt.

Maybe a better way to deal with this is to say that, for utilities with natural monopolies, like water companies, that aren't doing well, they can be compelled to sell part of their network to a neighboring utility that isn't having problems.

[–] christophski 12 points 1 year ago

Maybe networks that have a natural monopoly should be in the hands of the public

[–] JoBo 1 points 1 year ago

Natural monopolies for essential services should not be privately owned. You can't allow shareholders to take dividends while essential infrastructure rots, and it makes no sense for us all to be paying dividends to idle shareholders when we have no choice but to pay for the service they (are supposed to) provide.

Steve Reed, Labour’s shadow environment secretary pledged to “for the water companies to clean up their filth” through instant fines and more responsibility for bosses – but stopped short of calling for the industry’s nationalisation.

Of course he did. Power is so concentrated in so few hands, there isn't even an option on the ballot paper to stop this nonsense.

[–] tenebrisnox 1 points 1 year ago

Is there a neighbouring utility that isn’t also in similar trouble, though?