this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
910 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5277 readers
653 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (43 children)

Lb-Ft

FFS, just adopt the metric system already. And "lb" is not a force unit. Also don't capitalize unit abbreviations unless named after scientists.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

"pound foot" is the most intuitive name for a unit of force imaginable!

How much force? One pound of the foot. Easy!

[–] mdurell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Red Foreman agrees... "one pound of my foot in your ass"

[–] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's one pound per foot you moron!

/s

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just any old foot, a square one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a derived unit of torque. Pound is already a measure of force.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Of this, you and I, are quite aware.

The Joke, however, is in the air.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually pounds are a unit of force

Pounds~newtons

Slugs~ kilograms

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pounds are a unit of money. lbf (poundforce) is a misnomer, it’s actually the pressure required to stamp the King’s portrait into a £1 coin. Slightly changes with each monarch – or by a lot whenever they switch to cheaper materials because of devaluation. The frequent redefining of poundforce is now a major consequence of Brexit. /s

[–] echodot 4 points 1 year ago

Fairly sure there isn't any money with the king's face on yet. So we're still on the Elizabeth standard for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agoseris@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It's confusing, since "pound" is used for both force and mass.

1 lbm is roughly 0.45 kg

1 lbf is the force required to accelerate a 1 slug (32.2 lbm) mass 1 ft/s^2.

[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know slugs are just snails without shells, but they don't need to go faster

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know what the imperial system standards committee was up to, but I've never met a slug that was 32.2 lbm

You wouldn't know her, she goes to a different school.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mercifully, g=9.8 everywhere on Earth's surface, so we use weight interchangeably with mass, but yes, we should weigh ourselves in Newton: "I need to lose 10kg, so I can reach my ideal weigh of 700N" :P

[–] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mercifully, g=9.8 everywhere on Earth's

Big nope. It depends not only on height, but also on density of stuff under ground.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more of a "small yes" than a "big nope."

While gravity does vary, it goes from about 9.76 to about 9.83.

All of which does, in fact, round to 9.8

[–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On ISS it's 8.722, but it's constantly falling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The pedantry in this post is so dense you would need a torch to cut through it

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What's the variation? Does it ever get to 9.9 or 9.7? It's a negligible "nope" for people weighing themselves :D

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We already have a permanently inhabited base outside Earth (ISS) with effectively zero gravity and there might be one on the Moon or Mars in 100 years. We should pass treaties to only use metric in space – a probe has been lost to unit confusion already.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On ISS it's ≈.89g, but agreed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)