this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
1182 points (94.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5872 readers
4993 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
1182
Yup (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
145 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that protecting your income means potentially pushing people out of their home and onto the street is not good, that's a problem with the system.

A lot of what you're saying is true, but I dont see how any of this refutes what the OP says, and what i said previously.

I dont agree with that bit about a landlord being more vulnerable. if you're being evicted, theres a good chance you wont be able to afford rent anywhere else. The landlord would ideally be able to sell extra properties to protect themselves and keep their home, renters dont usually own property. Where do you think people go when they can't afford a place to live?

This is a systemic problem that wont go away unless we make housing more equitable. I mean, why should a landlord with a mortgage be able to take out multiple mortgages if a few bad tenants would actually make them homeless? No one should be homeless, banks dont need a house to live in. And as i said previously... "The fact that protecting your income means potentially pushing people out of their home and onto the street is not good,"