this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
72 points (97.4% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8771 readers
1 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Byereddithellolemmy@lemmy.world
chevy9294@monero.town
72
Any good alternative for Google Photos? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm looking for a solution that satisfies:

  1. Open source, or partially open source.
  2. Have good privacy practice. Even better if I can get away from 5 Eyes or 9 Eyes.
  3. Have an application for Android that supports auto-sync.

Self-hosting is also an option, but I would prefer a lightweight setup. I checked Immich requirements, but it requires 2 CPU cores and 4 GB memory, which costs way too much if I want to host it on my AWS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aufschieber@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Synology Photo. Then you even have your own "cloud" storage at home.

[–] devdad@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Definitely this. I run a home lab, six servers, and I use Synology Photos because it’s so much better than the self hosted alternatives.

[–] mercator_rejection@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does Synology Photos support shared albums where any user can contribute photos?

[–] Aufschieber@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. But I have mixed experience with this. How well it works might depend heavily on your internet speed (up/down) and on the performance of the synology. Overall user experience is a lot slower than any other commercial service.

[–] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks for the cool option. But I just checked, and it seems like there's no way I can set up a QuickConnect ID without a real Synology hardware. I'm a nomad so buying a physical Disk Station is not my preference.

[–] TerryMathews@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://xpenology.com/forum/topic/61634-dsm-7x-loaders-and-platforms/

There really is nothing close to Google Photos outside of Synology. And it's not 100% in terms of search but it's getting there.

You can run the Synology software via a loader on commodity hardware or on a hosting platform provided the platform supports VMWare ESXi or the like.

[–] comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You can use your own domain instead of a quickconnect id.