this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
1182 points (94.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5863 readers
4142 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geolaw@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The "benevolent king" is a persistent myth isn't it? They feature in so, so many works of fiction

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It's a persistent myth because the institution is set up to perpetuate it. Everything bad is the nobles, the lords, the boyars, the merchants. But if the king, all-powerful and distant, only KNEW about these abuses...

[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I can make decisions unilaterally, I'll be more efficient not having to seek as much agreement from stakeholders, as long as we assume I'll make good decisions.

I think benevolent dictatorship can exist but only for a couple generations at best, and that is also probably exceedingly rare.

Greed being a virtue these days and corruption running rampant probably lowers these odds.

And all rulers grades are still subject to whatever constraints and opportunities their situation places them in. Without Philip investing in army and drill, Alexander could never have done what he did. Also I'm sure having an external enemy to loot and enrich your people's is a big lever too.

I think the more interesting modern question is about democracy versus single party rule like CCP. If the big benefit of democracy is we get more and better ideas and efficiency through private industry, how does the Internet making all information globally free and the global economy change that? I fear democracy loses a lot of inherent advantage in the same way Chinese companies steal IP or copy other products.

They also have the efficiency similar to the dictators. They can much better execute 40 year plans without having to switch parties and priorities every decade. How does democracy beat that in the information age?