this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
53 points (98.2% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

3574 readers
2 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That's a 2000% increase in 2 weeks! Congratulations all! I'm so proud of what we are building together here!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stux@geddit.social 9 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Yesss and around 800K are spam accounts.. :(

[–] zero_iq@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Also a way to harvest personal data and passwords, and drive traffic to instances.

New users tend to register with the busiest servers. So, start your own instance, flood it with fake users to get to the top of the rankings. Tweak Lemmy to store passwords instead of hashes. Allow open registration, sit back and wait for people to sign up with their emails and potentially-reused passwords.

Ranking instances by number of users drives undesirable behaviours all-round.

[–] lazy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I guess this is a potential disadvantage to decentralization. With a centralized site, the owner would have a vested interest in the security of the site because culpability for stolen passwords or other nefarious things would fall back to them. Here, with a decentralized model, instance owners can manipulate the particular instance to not match others and do nefarious things. Up to now I had only heard of the benefits of decentralization and hadn't thought of this. Food for thought perhaps. All it takes is a few or even one nefarious instance (if its bad enough) to spoil the general public's thought on this model.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)