this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
48 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
658 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
48
Does anyone know of a trustworthy and curated list of qanon sites that I can use for my pihole(s)? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So, until recently, I have been using https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/blob/master/hosts.txt

However, as some issues that I have opened have shown, there are a bunch of left wing and progressive sites on this list ( https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/issues ). I no longer think that it is trustworthy. Especially after reading some of the repo owners replies. Intentionally added was t.me which is a generic url for any telegram group. Discordapp.com was on it at one point.

Oy Vey. It's clear to me that the owner of this repo is not actually spending much time actually curating this list and instead it's just a shotgun approach. Does anyone know of a good alternative?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Easily conned elderly parents with poor internet savvy are a thing. They get manipulated out of their life savings too often. Keeping them from being linked to conspiracy sites they otherwise may not encounter on purpose probably isn’t a bad thing.

Just an example.

[–] lonewalk@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK, I guess that's a valid edge case. Still, I'd be wary of how that would really work out - if they were to become aware that you were filtering the internet, I would suspect that could lead to some really bad conflict.

Though, for the very elderly, yeah they probably wouldn't notice. There's some nuance there I didn't think about.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, if they’re of the mindset that they want to visit websites like that and are mad about it, there’s probably drama going on no matter what.

But if they’re just confused and wondering why you’re doing it, probably sitting down with them and a curated list of Jim Browning’s YouTube channel on scammers would be a good step.

[–] lonewalk@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, OK, I didn't realize QAnon had outright financial scams out of it. Wow.

(Found this research on one particular scam - helps put it into perspective. Linking for anyone else who might be unaware)

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

Oh shit yeah, with the current grassroots environment everyone and their mother has a donation page up for themselves or a cause.

Also makes it really easy for people who don’t care about anything qanon to inject their own scams in, because requesting money for incomprehensible bullshit reasons blends right in.