this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15644 readers
397 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papalonian@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Larger nozzles do kick ass. I personally use my 0.6 nozzles pretty heavily. As others have mentioned though, there are definitely scenarios where you'll really want or even need to drop to a smaller size. My printer hates trying to print PETG at higher sizes for example, maybe my hot end isn't powerful enough.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it also consumes way more filament- especially on single-wall parts or parts that have x perimeters rather than a perimeter thickness. They're great for structural prints, and large prints that you want done quickly. For comparison, a .4mm nozzle will have a nozzle area of about 0.125 mm^2, where a 0.6mm is .28 mm^2. and .8mm is .502mm^2. More than double the extrusion width.

like basically everything else in 3d printing, it's all about compromise and which compromises are acceptable.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, I don't agree with consumes 'way more' filament.

If your design calls for 1mm width wall. You're doing two passes with a 0.4 nozzle (0.5 width x2) or one pass with a 0.8 nozzle (1 width x1)

It's the same plastic.

You'll use more plastic on the infill, but you could arguably use a lower % infill if the infill wall thickness is larger.

So you could be using more plastic overall, but I don't think it would qualify as 'way more'.. maybe like 10% to 20% more.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

10-20 % comes out to $3-6 extra for the same parts across a 2kg reel. For parts that are structural or large (and not meant to be seen, or will be post processed anyway,) the advantages in strength and speed could be worth it.

But, that 3-6 adds up significantly over time.

I do agree that .6 and .8mm nozzles have a place in anyone’s kit. I don’t agree that this excludes .4mm or smaller nozzles from a similar place

It’s all about finding the right balance.