this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1169 points (96.1% liked)
Technology
59237 readers
3529 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"an inverse vaccine"
Oh good, at least they didn't choose a name that's gonna cause confusion.
TIL you can wait until you have the disease to take the vaccine. So if my kid gets polio, I'll give them the vaccine then, but I don't want to risk anything bad happening so I'll wait. I'm glad I did my research.
Treatment. The word they are looking for is treatment.
I swear to god these research firms absolutely need to get ahead of how they refer to this shit publicly. People are way too dumb to just speak literally.
That naming does makes sense, given what the treatment does, although I agree they really need to work on their marketing and come up with a term that won't cause confusion or get the anti-vax folk excitable.
From the article:
It does make sense. And it is so so easy to get tangled.
"Inverse vaccine" sounds like instead of preventing a disease through a weakened or dead version of the thing you're preventing, they inject you with a stronger version of the thing you already have to kick it's ass.
"This body is spoken for."