this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
1181 points (92.5% liked)

Memes

45724 readers
1463 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Closed licenses are arguably better for certain left projects, particularly self-contained ones. You can use bourgeois legal nonsense to stop corpos from using your work.

I've seen anti-war people write open source code that ended up getting used to help fly war drones.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Closed licenses are arguably better for certain left projects

What about licenses that restrict the software from being used in a certain way? I think I've heard of at least one open-source license that disallows the software from being used in the military industry.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

A license that has restrictions like that doesn't meet the criteria to call itself "open source."

[–] dubba@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Free/libre software is not the same as open source, but I agree that it is difficult to enforce prohibitions with source available.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

No, I mean that item number 6 of the Open Source Definition specifically states you cannot restrict the use of the software for any particular field or endeavor. That includes use in military applications.

If you have restrictions like that in your license, it's not open source.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)