this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1389 points (97.6% liked)

Antiwork

3567 readers
6 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reich also went out his way to screw the working class. Citing him just shows someone is citing someone that is saying what they want to hear.

He went out of his way to screw people when he was in power.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least he got minimum wage increased

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He did not such thing. Congress has the power to set the minimum wage. Maybe you need to brush up on how bad this man destroyed the middle class.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, he didn't specifically himself pass it, but he was Secretary of Labor and he lobbied for it. He's also the reason we have FMLA.

I don't think it's fair to say he "destroyed" the middle class.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fmla is garbage. 12 weeks of unpaid time off

Yes it provides job protection but many people can’t afford that much unpaid time off.

It’s fair. He went against the unions to push nafta through which decimated the middle class. We say lots of high paying manufacturing jobs move to Mexico and Canada. That decimated the middle class and he knew it. You either defend unions or you don’t. He didn’t. It destroyed the middle class last

https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/#:~:text=By%20establishing%20the%20principle%20that,end%20of%20World%20War%20II.

[–] Borimino@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

Can you recommend a place to start brushing up on that?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In what way did Robert Reich of all people "go out of his way to screw the working class"?

This should be good..

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guessing it's this:

Throughout his first year in office, Reich was a leading proponent of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was negotiated by the George H. W. Bush administration and supported by Clinton following two side agreements negotiated to satisfy labor and environmental groups. Reich served as leading public and private spokesman for the Clinton administration against organized labor, who continued to oppose the Agreement as a whole.

In July 1993, Reich said that the unions were "just plain wrong" to suggest NAFTA would cause a loss of American employment and predicted that "given the pace of growth of the Mexican automobile market over the next 15 years, I would say that more automobile jobs would be created in the United States than would be lost to Mexico... [T]he American automobile industry will grow substantially, and the net effect will be an increase in automobile jobs." He further argued that trade liberalization following World War II had led to the "biggest increase in jobs and standard of living among the industrialized nations [in] history. "[31]

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sounds more like him being wrong and/or lied to by the Clinton administration that was mostly far to the right of him on just about anything than any sort of malice on his part, much less "going out of his way to screw the working class"..

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is an extremely generous take.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really, no. Would be extremely out of character and go against what he's been doing for all the rest of career to deliberately hurt workers.

He didn't leave the Clinton administration because everyone agreed with him and let him do what he thought was best without undue influence..

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, really, because you want to give him this huge benefit of the doubt when it's one of the few things where he actually had influence and what he did was the opposite of all the principles he professes. Occam's razor there is that it's just classic political hypocrisy, waxing poetic all day about your principles but then doing the wrong thing any time it actually counts.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I'm giving him the benefit of everything else he's ever done. That's not just doubt, that's evidence of a several decades pattern of behaviour that in no way fits your supposition.

As for it being "one of the few things where he actually had influence", that's overstating how much influence he ever had when Clinton set his mind to something while simultaneously ignoring his massively influential work in academia and documentary film making.

Occam would take his razor away from you since you obviously have no clue how it or indeed anything works.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

OK, what were his other accomplishments, or points of big influence? Anything bigger than NAFTA?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First of all, NAFTA wasn't Reich any more than the IRA was Bernie Sanders; it had been in the works since 1988 and his involvement wasn't significant enough to merit a single mention in the Wikipedia article (unlike such people as Al Gore, Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers Laura Tyson, Director of the National Economic Council Robert Rubin, and even Republican Congressman David Dreier, all of which were mentioned specifically by Clinton at the signing), so giving him the blame is absolutely ridiculous.

As for HIS actual accomplishments, this reply is already plenty long, especially considering that you have probably made up your mind and won't believe it no matter what, so I'm just gonna direct you to his Wikipedia article where you can see for yourself.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

OK, so in other words:

  • The Secretary of Labor's input on how NAFTA would affect U.S. labor was insignificant
  • You're not willing to list what other accomplishments of his were more significant
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct. He wasn't listened to much in that administration (that's why he left) and I've already provided a link to an exhaustive list of his accomplishments.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro tip for all the people reading, don't just double down when you're wrong.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Take your own advice. Also, leave me alone.