this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
309 points (98.4% liked)

Games

16729 readers
568 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hubi@feddit.de 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, pretty radical, but what a cool move. I'm sure it'll be a good thing for the fans of the games and universe in the long run.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a shame that it's even considered "radical" since it's basically a copyright holder upholding their end of the bargain in the promise behind the origin of copyright. To incentivize creative content, a creator is given sole ability to monetize it for a fixed period of time. In return for that protection, the public gets it at the end of the term. Today's copyright is so far off course that it defeats the intent. There's no incentive to create anything new if you can keep milking existing content. And the public never gets a return for offering that protection.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Companies expect to sell something a million times and still own it.

Nah, guys. Culture belongs to its audience. It's ours. We bought it. That's what the money was for.

[–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pretty radical for a dude who throws his conservative believes into everything?

The author of Fables is very conservative in his political beliefs. He has written anti-abortion and pro-Isreal material into the Fables comics themselves.

[–] gk99@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, yeah, considering "conservatives" generally only seem to care about taking rights away from others. Giving back is pretty radical of them.