this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
7 points (63.0% liked)

Україна | Ukraine 🇺🇦

1467 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Ukraine!

Ласкаво просимо в Україну!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Qualia@lemmy.ml
7
WSJ: Ukraine could be forced to compromise. With support for the war against Russia waning in the U.S., the counteroffensive may define a new border. (archive.ph)
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/ukraine@lemmy.ml
246 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lmao you went back and edited your comment to remove the part I replied to (political bias vs political alignment).

you're welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I'll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

I see nothing left in your comment that explains how that’s not what the spectrum illustrates

I hold no surprise that you fail to comprehend something when your argument relies upon you not comprehending.

your opinion notwithstanding, what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I've made-- nor can I be held responsible for such.

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you’re welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I’ll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

Legit fucking gaslighting. You know damn well there isn't an edit history. But I replied to the part you removed with:

What, political bias vs political alignment?

My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legit fucking gaslighting

no, it's just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

so you claim...

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

It's unprovable, which you know damn well. I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s unprovable, which you know damn well.

I also know that it's not my problem, something you should have considered before making such a claim.

I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

so you claim...

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How about you respond to the part where I respond to what's left of your comment?

in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

why would i give your fallacious argument legitimacy by engaging with it?

your opinion notwithstanding, what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made-- nor can I be held responsible for such.

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made

Then please explain what the following means, because it isn't proper grammar and you just called my best attempt at interpreting it "words I put in your mouth".

in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why would i give your fallacious argument legitimacy by engaging with it?

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God this is such bad faith bullshit. Fuck off.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not responsible for your psychological projection. I would point out that you’re the one who keeps returning to an interaction you find frustrating and unsatisfying expecting different results, and blaming me because I won’t give you the answers you want.

[–] edward@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I said fuck off.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

I am not responsible for your psychological projection. I would point out that you’re the one who keeps returning to an interaction you find frustrating and unsatisfying expecting different results, and blaming me because I won’t give you the answers you want.