Programmer Humor

32561 readers

398 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

595

Was Unity lying yesterday or are they lying today? (lemmy.today)

submitted 1 year ago by nothingcorporate@lemmy.today to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can they tell the differences between installs or can't they? Either way, they're definitely lying to their users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They’re straight up gaslighting!

Before:

Yes. The creator will need to pay for all future installs. The reason is that Unity doesn’t receive end-player information, just aggregate data.

After:

We are not going to charge a fee for reinstalls. The spirit of this program is and has always been to charge for the first install and we have no desire to charge for the same person doing ongoing installs.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Someone tell them they can achieve the latter much more effectively if they simply charge once FOR EACH COPY SOLD.

Hmmm... but then what about humble bundle sales or freemium games? Maybe the charge should change depending on the price of the game...

OH WAIT THAT'S REVENUE SHARE. Seriusly this whole thing is just an attempt at taking more money than devs would be willing to pay, by using a model without an up front percentage.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

kind of hard to gaslight when hundreds of news sites already have copies of the thing you said before published

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Didn’t stop them from trying!