this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
477 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59237 readers
3364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] accideath@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, they put last year’s chip in the phone, which does not support USB 3 speeds. If the non Pro iPhone 16 won’t support usb 3, then it’s deliberate kneecapping. Now it’s just unfortunate.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still find it scummy that you get a year old hardware at current year prices. If the price was not at flagship level, then sure you could justify older chips.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the price isn’t at flagship level. At least not from Apple’s view. You pay less, you get less (which is still en par if not ahead in most regards, compared to the competition)

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Simple anchoring effect at work. Price flagship higher, so expensive "cheap" option looks cheaper by comparison. Truth of the matter is, it's all inflated prices, not only exclusive to Apple.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, yea, obviously. Adjusted for inflation, the iPhone 15 without contract costs about as much as the iPhone 4 (it’s technically even $40 cheaper). The Pro models are much more expensive, of course, which was a bit less questionable, when pro and non pro shared the same chip. Now, the non pro is a generation behind… At least imo though, there’s not much reason to spend the extra on the Pro, at least not as an average user, especially since, performance wise, last years chip still outperforms the competition. But then again, I myself barely classify as average user since I’m a proud user of the 13 mini…

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kind of funny that when they used lightning, they got a pass for failing to keep up with the industry standard that's over a decode old.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well, not really. Most people complained for years now about lightning. Not necessarily about the lack of usb 3 speeds but that’s probably because for the vast majority of people, that doesn’t matter