this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
124 points (83.7% liked)

Technology

59237 readers
4321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dsmk@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Since users choose their gender in the app, this has some potential to be used for more nefarious purposes, no?

Not a big fan of discriminatory options like this, btw.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

They'd need a toggle for the feature on the rider side as well. Like "hide my gender"

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wouldn't need it at all if rideshare drivers stopped sexually assaulting passengers

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There are plenty of sexually aggressive riders too. It's not one sided. We can summarize it thus: people suck.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perhaps this whole "random people using their regular car to give rides to total strangers" thing was a bad idea...

What if instead the rides were given in specially modified cars that can include some security features for both parties? And in order to pay for this, perhaps there could be some kind of central company that owned the cars and simply hired the drivers?

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity!

On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

True! Good point

[–] flumph@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

riders were the accused party 43% of the time in sexual assault incident reports

[–] dsmk@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can't really comment on that as in my city (not US) to drive for these companies you need a license. To get the license, they perform background checks, check your criminal record, ask for medical approval, etc, every time you have to renew it, and all this seems to stop a lot of bad stuff. Not saying it doesn't happen - you can't never completely stop it - but there are ways to reduce it.

Anyway, they could just allow customers to select their preferred gender, would make anyone that wants to use such option happy, and we wouldn't even have to talk about discrimination.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd assume if you get legal action thrown at you though, it'd be a lot harder to deny if you also were picking a gender to get specific drivers.

[–] dsmk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Legal action for picking the "wrong" option in an app? Also, "I'm gender fluid, your honor", so good luck proving anything.

By "nefarious purposes" I meant serious stuff. Some deranged fuck decides to kill (edit: a certain gender) and there's not much you can do after they point a gun or put a knife to the driver's neck. It's too late by then.

I don't know, I understand their intention, but it seems to have some flaws.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure the nefarious purpose one isn't actually dealt with by this and is an extreme outlier

[–] flumph@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Explain how sorting the list of available passengers by gender is discrimination? It's being rolled out in huge metropolitan markets so there will be enough drivers for everyone to get one.

[–] bou@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@flumph if they allowed sorting the list by race, instead of by gender... would you understand how it's discrimination, then?

[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature.

[–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

@flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you?

[–] dsmk@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The option allows customers to prioritize drivers from two of their 3 gender groups: "female" and "non-binary". One group is left out and if you happen to be in that group, you'll end up doing less trips, making less money.

I wouldn't be happy with a setting to prioritize "male", so you can see why I'm not happy with a setting that prioritizes "female" and "non-binary". You either give the customer the option to prioritize any gender or you don't.

Since they can't verify one's gender, the potential for abuse is there. A customer could prioritise these groups if they wanted to target them and the driver could also pick one of these genders if they wanted to have people of said gender in their car.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

The option allows customers to prioritize drivers...

Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers.