this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
144 points (95.6% liked)

retrocomputing

4122 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] piranhaphish@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I used the proprietary predecessor, Stacker.

It was pretty magical. It turned my 40 MB hard drive into a (seemingly) 80 MB hard drive.

I don't remember there being a significant performance penalty, because it was presumably overshadowed by the relatively (compared to processor speed) slow disk speeds.

[–] Tathas@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Both times I used either one of them, it crashed in the middle of compressing my hard drive and I had to reformat. But they worked fine the 2nd try!

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Stacker was the one I used also. It really did work

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 3 points 1 year ago

"I don't remember a performance penalty, because everything was so slow it didn't matter"