Speaking to an interviewer from Russian state media channel Россия 1, Col. Gen. Mordvichev says the quiet part out loud regarding the broader goals of Russian policy: namely that the ambition of conquering Ukraine is only a stepping stone to attacking the rest of Eastern Europe, a course of action which he presents as a necessity ("we will have to attack").

I would opine that statements like these, brazenly uttered to domestic mass media by a senior military figure, are indicative of the realities of Russian ambitions: to revive Russian imperial domination of Eastern Europe by force of arms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ukraine is winning, just not as quickly as we'd like.

I know some speculate that the west is interested in drawing this out, to bleed the Russian military as much as possible.

But this war is harmful to the west too, most obviously the economy is generally slowing down because of the increased energy cost. Also hunger in African countries could increase unwanted immigration to the west. That's apart from the purely humanitarian aspect, of innocent Ukrainians suffering the worst of it.

Of course if you are cynical enough to want the war to drag on, the humanitarian aspects are probably irrelevant. But even for the cynical, there are reasons to want Ukraine to win quickly. The Russian war machine is already ruined. Both their capability, but more importantly the poor performance should make any Russian leader think twice before using it again.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can speak for Germany at least, the political will to actually follow up on the "Zeitenwende", as chancellor Scholz announced, is wavering. Apart from artillery munition, our government failed to order anything in large enough quantities to suggest they are working towards a more capable military, let alone increased support for Ukraine. No new tanks, no IFVs, only a small amount of air defense and fighter planes and no new artillery platforms. The military industry in Germany has not had large orders for any of the mentioned systems placed.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand Scholz' decisions so far. He's like working in favor of Russia while yet going against it sometimes. I haven't heard his party nor coalition partners aren't particularly pro-Russia.

Honestly, what is he after?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

It's just domestic politics, as usual. There are those within the government that want to spend less money on everything, there are those concerned about anti-war movements or general apathy in the population, a historic resistance against military buildup and the chancellor is unwilling to ruffle anyone's feathers by actually committing to any rearmament plan. Half-measures are the name of the game.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would absolutely love to see Germany go all in on helping Ukraine, Germany is the biggest economy in Europe, and would make a huge difference if they committed.

IDK how much they help compared to others, but I know it was a historic event that they gave any military help at all. Because they've held back all the years since WW2. So that's quite an accomplishment for Putin on top of everything else, like expansion of NATO and increased military budgets in many NATO countries.

I think it seems like a pretty impressive list of help though.

https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/military-support-ukraine-2054992

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Also hunger in African countries could increase unwanted immigration to the west

I've been assuming this is their intention ever since they started sabotaging the grain deal. It worked with brexit and is causing ongoing internal tension in Europe.